Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 100/100 | 31/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 68/100 |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 68/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.74/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$3.48/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
396K
964K
Completed sessions
1,516,848
125,742,584
Token share
0.41%
14.1%
Tokens
5.6T-79%
189T+100%
SEP 13NOV 7
SEP 13NOV 7
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
56%30K user-weeks
72.3%14K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba Mini