Compare AI models: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs GLM-5.1
- Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
- GLM-5.1ZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | 100/100 | 90/100 | 81/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 100/100 |
| GLM-5.1 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 88/100 | 34/100 | 46/100 | 0/100 | 45/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
200K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.90/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$3.59/ 1M
Cached input
$0.002/ 1M
$0.19/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.3M
28K
Completed sessions
308,351,432
78,322
Token share
15.4%
0%
Tokens
206T+327%
32B-86%
SEP 13NOV 7
SEP 13NOV 7
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.3%58K user-weeks
46.8%1K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5.1 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.1·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5.1 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.1·Jamba Mini