CompareAI models
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- GLM-5.2Zhipu
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 100/100 | 74/100 | 81/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | No data |
| GLM-5.2 | 100/100 | 78/100 | 34/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 100/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.14/ 1M
$1.40/ 1M
Output
$0.28/ 1M
$4.40/ 1M
Cached input
$0.03/ 1M
$0.26/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2.4M
1.1M
Completed sessions
11,846,683
1,681,644
Token share
72.3%
3.2%
Tokens
192T+454%
8.5T+905%
JUN 22AUG 16
JUN 22AUG 16
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITDeepSeek V4 Flash·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeGLM-5.2 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITGLM-5.2·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27BDeepSeek V4 Flash·Qwen3.8 27BRelated comparisonGLM-5.2 vs Qwen3.8 27BGLM-5.2·Qwen3.8 27B