GitHub[220K]試用 OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
  2. MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash100/100100/10064/10081/10033/10092/100
MiMo-V2.6-Flash31/10058/10078/10092/10067/10055/100
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.22/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$0.66/ 1M
$0.28/ 1M
Cached input
$0.007/ 1M
$0.05/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
5.5M
1.2M
Completed sessions
150,343,443
39,757,340
Token share
49.3%
4.14%
Tokens
660T+4,848%
55T+100%
SEP 13NOV 7
SEP 13NOV 7
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
72.8%522K user-weeks
78.9%7.5K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.